Deception: How Much Is Too Much?
Belkin has been receiving a lot of flak today, rightly, for their attempt to buy positive ratings on Amazon. Marketing is inherently deceptive, but we have grown accustomed to it, and to an extent skeptical of it, with time. So at what point does marketing become unacceptably deceptive?
One obvious answer to me would be that it becomes unacceptable when the viewer is unaware that content is an advertisement, because they will then tend to drop their guard, and take information at face value. This would explain why Belkin’s plan was so badly received, after all, advertising agencies hire celebrity spokespeople all the time, who have likely never used the product they’re endorsing. So long as people are aware of the ad, it is relatively acceptable.
Why, then, is search engine optimization seen as acceptable? Certainly, some forms, like link farms, aren’t, but using keywords, rearranging content and the like are all quite normal. This is curious, since it’s entirely undetectable by end users. The keywords may be appropriate for a given site, but why should that site be pushed ahead of one which is more relevant to a particular search, simply because it gamed the system, in however minor a way.
If you consider this acceptable, why is it distinct from what Belkin did and, if not, why don’t you think people mind? I’d love to hear your thoughts in the comments.